Individualized prescriptive inference in ischaemic stroke

Dominic Giles (), Chris Foulon, Guilherme Pombo, James K. Ruffle, Tianbo Xu, H. Rolf Jäger, Jorge Cardoso, Sebastien Ourselin, Geraint Rees, Ashwani Jha and Parashkev Nachev ()
Additional contact information
Dominic Giles: University College London
Chris Foulon: University College London
Guilherme Pombo: University College London
James K. Ruffle: University College London
Tianbo Xu: University College London
H. Rolf Jäger: University College London
Jorge Cardoso: King’s College London
Sebastien Ourselin: King’s College London
Geraint Rees: University College London
Ashwani Jha: University College London
Parashkev Nachev: University College London

Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Abstract The gold standard in the treatment of ischaemic stroke is set by evidence from randomized controlled trials, typically using simple estimands of presumptively homogeneous populations. Yet the manifest complexity of the brain’s functional, connective, and vascular architectures introduces heterogeneities that violate the underlying statistical premisses, potentially leading to substantial errors at both individual and population levels. The counterfactual nature of interventional inference renders quantifying the impact of this defect difficult. Here we conduct a comprehensive series of semi-synthetic, biologically plausible, virtual interventional trials across 100M+ distinct simulations. We generate empirically grounded virtual trial data from large-scale meta-analytic connective, functional, genetic expression, and receptor distribution data, with high-resolution maps of 4K+ acute ischaemic lesions. Within each trial, we estimate treatment effects using models varying in complexity, in the presence of increasingly confounded outcomes and noisy treatment responses. Individualized prescriptions inferred from simple models, fitted to unconfounded data, are less accurate than those from complex models, even when fitted to confounded data. Our results indicate that complex modelling with richly represented lesion data may substantively enhance individualized prescriptive inference in ischaemic stroke.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64593-7 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-64593-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-64593-7

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().