Upright human gait did not provide a major mechanical challenge for our ancestors

H.-M. Maus (), S.W. Lipfert, M. Gross, J. Rummel and A. Seyfarth
Additional contact information
H.-M. Maus: Lauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, University of Jena
S.W. Lipfert: Lauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, University of Jena
M. Gross: Lauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, University of Jena
J. Rummel: Lauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, University of Jena
A. Seyfarth: Lauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, University of Jena

Nature Communications, 2010, vol. 1, issue 1, 1-6

Abstract: Abstract Habitual bipedalism is considered as a major breakthrough in human evolution and is the defining feature of hominins. Upright posture is presumably less stable than quadrupedal posture, but when using external support, for example, toddlers assisted by their parents, postural stability becomes less critical. In this study, we show that humans seem to mimic such external support by creating a virtual pivot point (VPP) above their centre of mass. A highly reduced conceptual walking model based on this assumption reveals that such virtual support is sufficient for achieving and maintaining postural stability. The VPP is experimentally observed in walking humans and dogs and in running chickens, suggesting that it might be a convenient emergent behaviour of gait mechanics and not an intentional locomotion behaviour. Hence, it is likely that even the first hominis may have already applied the VPP, a mechanism that would have facilitated the development of habitual bipedalism.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1073 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:1:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms1073

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1073

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().