Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds
Karan J. Odom (),
Michelle L. Hall,
Katharina Riebel,
Kevin E. Omland and
Naomi E. Langmore
Additional contact information
Karan J. Odom: University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Michelle L. Hall: University of Melbourne
Katharina Riebel: Institute of Biology (IBL), Leiden University
Kevin E. Omland: University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Naomi E. Langmore: Research School of Biology, The Australian National University
Nature Communications, 2014, vol. 5, issue 1, 1-6
Abstract:
Abstract Bird song has historically been considered an almost exclusively male trait, an observation fundamental to the formulation of Darwin’s theory of sexual selection. Like other male ornaments, song is used by male songbirds to attract females and compete with rivals. Thus, bird song has become a textbook example of the power of sexual selection to lead to extreme neurological and behavioural sex differences. Here we present an extensive survey and ancestral state reconstruction of female song across songbirds showing that female song is present in 71% of surveyed species including 32 families, and that females sang in the common ancestor of modern songbirds. Our results reverse classical assumptions about the evolution of song and sex differences in birds. The challenge now is to identify whether sexual selection alone or broader processes, such as social or natural selection, best explain the evolution of elaborate traits in both sexes.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms4379 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:5:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms4379
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4379
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().