EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Homeostatic control of polo-like kinase-1 engenders non-genetic heterogeneity in G2 checkpoint fidelity and timing

Hongqing Liang, Alessandro Esposito, Siddharth De, Suzan Ber, Philippe Collin, Uttam Surana and Ashok R. Venkitaraman ()
Additional contact information
Hongqing Liang: Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road
Alessandro Esposito: Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road
Siddharth De: Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road
Suzan Ber: Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road
Philippe Collin: Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge
Uttam Surana: Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Biopolis Drive
Ashok R. Venkitaraman: Medical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road

Nature Communications, 2014, vol. 5, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Abstract The G2 checkpoint monitors DNA damage, preventing mitotic entry until the damage can be resolved. The mechanisms controlling checkpoint recovery are unclear. Here, we identify non-genetic heterogeneity in the fidelity and timing of damage-induced G2 checkpoint enforcement in individual cells from the same population. Single-cell fluorescence imaging reveals that individual damaged cells experience varying durations of G2 arrest, and recover with varying levels of remaining checkpoint signal or DNA damage. A gating mechanism dependent on polo-like kinase-1 (PLK1) activity underlies this heterogeneity. PLK1 activity continually accumulates from initial levels in G2-arrested cells, at a rate inversely correlated to checkpoint activation, until it reaches a threshold allowing mitotic entry regardless of remaining checkpoint signal or DNA damage. Thus, homeostatic control of PLK1 by the dynamic opposition between checkpoint signalling and pro-mitotic activities heterogeneously enforces the G2 checkpoint in each individual cell, with implications for cancer pathogenesis and therapy.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5048 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:5:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms5048

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5048

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:5:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms5048