The same self-peptide selects conventional and regulatory CD4+ T cells with identical antigen receptors

Lukasz Wojciech, Alicja Ignatowicz, Michal Seweryn, Grzegorz Rempala, Simarjot Singh Pabla, Richard A. McIndoe, Pawel Kisielow () and Leszek Ignatowicz ()
Additional contact information
Lukasz Wojciech: Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Regents University
Alicja Ignatowicz: Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Regents University
Michal Seweryn: Mathematical Biosciences Institute and College of Public Health, Ohio State University
Grzegorz Rempala: Mathematical Biosciences Institute and College of Public Health, Ohio State University
Simarjot Singh Pabla: Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Regents University
Richard A. McIndoe: Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Regents University
Pawel Kisielow: Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
Leszek Ignatowicz: Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Georgia Regents University

Nature Communications, 2014, vol. 5, issue 1, 1-10

Abstract: Abstract The role of the T-cell receptor (TCR) in commitment of thymocytes to regulatory CD4+Foxp3+ and conventional CD4+Foxp3− T-cell lineages remains controversial. According to the prevailing view, commitment to the former lineage, in contrast to the latter, requires that high affinity TCRs bind rare class II MHC/peptide complexes presented in ‘thymic niches’, which could explain differences between their TCR repertoires. Here we challenge this view and show that the binding of identical TCRs to the same ubiquitously expressed MHC/peptide complex often directs thymocytes to both CD4+ lineages, indicating that the TCR affinity does not play the instructive role, and that restricted presentation of peptides in ‘thymic niches’ is not necessary for selection of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells. However, depending on whether immature thymocytes bound the ligand predominantly with low or high affinity, the repertoires of regulatory and conventional CD4+ T cells were correspondingly similar or mostly different, suggesting that negative rather than positive selection sets them apart.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6061 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:5:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms6061

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6061

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().