EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Free mate choice enhances conservation breeding in the endangered giant panda

Meghan S. Martin-Wintle (), David Shepherdson, Guiquan Zhang, Hemin Zhang, Desheng Li, Xiaoping Zhou, Rengui Li and Ronald R. Swaisgood ()
Additional contact information
Meghan S. Martin-Wintle: Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global
David Shepherdson: Portland State University
Guiquan Zhang: China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Wolong
Hemin Zhang: China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Wolong
Desheng Li: China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Wolong
Xiaoping Zhou: China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Wolong
Rengui Li: China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda, Wolong
Ronald R. Swaisgood: Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global

Nature Communications, 2015, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-7

Abstract: Abstract Conservation breeding programmes have become an increasingly important tool to save endangered species, yet despite the allocation of significant resources, efforts to create self-sustaining populations have met with limited success. The iconic giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) embodies the struggles associated with ex situ species conservation. Here we show that behavioural mate preferences in giant pandas predict reproductive outcomes. Giant pandas paired with preferred partners have significantly higher copulation and birth rates. Reproductive rates increase further when both partners show mutual preference for one another. If managers were to incorporate mate preferences more fully into breeding management, the production of giant panda offspring for China’s reintroduction programme might be greatly expedited. When extended to the increasing numbers of species dependent on ex situ conservation breeding to avoid extinction, our findings highlight that mate preference and other aspects of informed behavioural management could make the difference between success and failure of these programmes.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10125 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms10125

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10125

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms10125