EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Revisiting the role of histo-blood group antigens in rotavirus host-cell invasion

Raphael Böhm, Fiona E. Fleming, Andrea Maggioni, Vi T. Dang, Gavan Holloway, Barbara S. Coulson, Mark von Itzstein () and Thomas Haselhorst ()
Additional contact information
Raphael Böhm: Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia
Fiona E. Fleming: The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
Andrea Maggioni: Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia
Vi T. Dang: The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
Gavan Holloway: The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
Barbara S. Coulson: The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity
Mark von Itzstein: Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia
Thomas Haselhorst: Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia

Nature Communications, 2015, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract Histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs) have been proposed as rotavirus receptors. H type-1 and Lewisb antigens have been reported to bind VP8* from major human rotavirus genotypes P[4], P[6] and P[8], while VP8* from a rarer P[14] rotavirus recognizes A-type HBGAs. However, the role and significance of HBGA receptors in rotavirus pathogenesis remains uncertain. Here we report that P[14] rotavirus HAL1166 and the related P[9] human rotavirus K8 bind to A-type HBGAs, although neither virus engages the HBGA-specific α1,2-linked fucose moiety. Notably, human rotaviruses DS-1 (P[4]) and RV-3 (P[6]) also use A-type HBGAs for infection, with fucose involvement. However, human P[8] rotavirus Wa does not recognize A-type HBGAs. Furthermore, the common human rotaviruses that we have investigated do not use Lewisb and H type-1 antigens. Our results indicate that A-type HBGAs are receptors for human rotaviruses, although rotavirus strains vary in their ability to recognize these antigens.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6907 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms6907

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6907

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms6907