EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Detoxification of hostplant’s chemical defence rather than its anti-predator co-option drives β-glucosidase-mediated lepidopteran counteradaptation

Spoorthi Poreddy, Sirsha Mitra, Matthias Schöttner, Jima Chandran, Bernd Schneider, Ian T. Baldwin (), Pavan Kumar and Sagar S. Pandit ()
Additional contact information
Spoorthi Poreddy: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Sirsha Mitra: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Matthias Schöttner: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Jima Chandran: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Bernd Schneider: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Ian T. Baldwin: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Pavan Kumar: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology
Sagar S. Pandit: Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology

Nature Communications, 2015, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Abstract The evolutionary plant–herbivore arms race sometimes gives rise to remarkably unique adaptation strategies. Here we report one such strategy in the lepidopteran herbivore Manduca sexta against its hostplant Nicotiana attenuata’s major phytotoxins, 17-hydroxygeranyllinalool diterpene glycoside, lyciumoside IV and its malonylated forms. We show that alkalinity of larval regurgitant non-enzymatically demalonylates the malonylated forms to lyciumoside IV. Lyciumoside IV is then detoxified in the midgut by β-glucosidase 1-catalysed deglycosylation, which is unusual, as typically the deglycosylation of glycosylated phytochemicals by insects results in the opposite: toxin activation. Suppression of deglucosylation by silencing larval β-glucosidase 1 by plant-mediated RNAi causes moulting impairments and mortality. In the native habitat of N. attenuata, β-glucosidase 1 silencing also increases larval unpalatability to native predatory spiders, suggesting that the defensive co-option of lyciumoside IV may be ecologically advantageous. We infer that M. sexta detoxifies this allelochemical to avoid its deleterious effects, rather than co-opting it against predators.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms9525 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms9525

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9525

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms9525