Coevolution of parental investment and sexually selected traits drives sex-role divergence
Lutz Fromhage () and
Michael D. Jennions ()
Additional contact information
Lutz Fromhage: Department of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyvaskyla
Michael D. Jennions: Ecology, Evolution & Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University
Nature Communications, 2016, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-11
Abstract:
Abstract Sex-role evolution theory attempts to explain the origin and direction of male–female differences. A fundamental question is why anisogamy, the difference in gamete size that defines the sexes, has repeatedly led to large differences in subsequent parental care. Here we construct models to confirm predictions that individuals benefit less from caring when they face stronger sexual selection and/or lower certainty of parentage. However, we overturn the widely cited claim that a negative feedback between the operational sex ratio and the opportunity cost of care selects for egalitarian sex roles. We further argue that our model does not predict any effect of the adult sex ratio (ASR) that is independent of the source of ASR variation. Finally, to increase realism and unify earlier models, we allow for coevolution between parental investment and investment in sexually selected traits. Our model confirms that small initial differences in parental investment tend to increase due to positive evolutionary feedback, formally supporting long-standing, but unsubstantiated, verbal arguments.
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12517 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms12517
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12517
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().