EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Amphibian gut microbiota shifts differentially in community structure but converges on habitat-specific predicted functions

Molly C. Bletz (), Daniel J. Goedbloed, Eugenia Sanchez, Timm Reinhardt, Christoph C. Tebbe, Sabin Bhuju, Robert Geffers, Michael Jarek, Miguel Vences and Sebastian Steinfartz ()
Additional contact information
Molly C. Bletz: Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Daniel J. Goedbloed: Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Eugenia Sanchez: Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Timm Reinhardt: Institute for Zoology and Cell Biology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Sabin Bhuju: Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Robert Geffers: Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Michael Jarek: Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Miguel Vences: Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Sebastian Steinfartz: Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig

Nature Communications, 2016, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract Complex microbial communities inhabit vertebrate digestive systems but thorough understanding of the ecological dynamics and functions of host-associated microbiota within natural habitats is limited. We investigate the role of environmental conditions in shaping gut and skin microbiota under natural conditions by performing a field survey and reciprocal transfer experiments with salamander larvae inhabiting two distinct habitats (ponds and streams). We show that gut and skin microbiota are habitat-specific, demonstrating environmental factors mediate community structure. Reciprocal transfer reveals that gut microbiota, but not skin microbiota, responds differentially to environmental change. Stream-to-pond larvae shift their gut microbiota to that of pond-to-pond larvae, whereas pond-to-stream larvae change to a community structure distinct from both habitat controls. Predicted functions, however, match that of larvae from the destination habitats in both cases. Thus, microbial function can be matched without taxonomic coherence and gut microbiota appears to exhibit metagenomic plasticity.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13699 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms13699

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13699

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms13699