EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Killing by Type VI secretion drives genetic phase separation and correlates with increased cooperation

Luke McNally, Eryn Bernardy, Jacob Thomas, Arben Kalziqi, Jennifer Pentz, Sam P. Brown, Brian K. Hammer, Peter J. Yunker () and William C. Ratcliff ()
Additional contact information
Luke McNally: Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh
Eryn Bernardy: School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
Jacob Thomas: School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
Arben Kalziqi: School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology
Jennifer Pentz: School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
Sam P. Brown: School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
Brian K. Hammer: School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
Peter J. Yunker: School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology
William C. Ratcliff: School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology

Nature Communications, 2017, vol. 8, issue 1, 1-11

Abstract: Abstract By nature of their small size, dense growth and frequent need for extracellular metabolism, microbes face persistent public goods dilemmas. Genetic assortment is the only general solution stabilizing cooperation, but all known mechanisms structuring microbial populations depend on the availability of free space, an often unrealistic constraint. Here we describe a class of self-organization that operates within densely packed bacterial populations. Through mathematical modelling and experiments with Vibrio cholerae, we show how killing adjacent competitors via the Type VI secretion system (T6SS) precipitates phase separation via the ‘Model A’ universality class of order-disorder transition mediated by killing. We mathematically demonstrate that T6SS-mediated killing should favour the evolution of public goods cooperation, and empirically support this prediction using a phylogenetic comparative analysis. This work illustrates the twin role played by the T6SS, dealing death to local competitors while simultaneously creating conditions potentially favouring the evolution of cooperation with kin.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14371 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14371

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14371

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14371