Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties

Joeri Rogelj (), Oliver Fricko, Malte Meinshausen, Volker Krey, Johanna J. J. Zilliacus and Keywan Riahi
Additional contact information
Joeri Rogelj: ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Oliver Fricko: ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Malte Meinshausen: Australian-German College of Climate & Energy Transitions, The University of Melbourne
Volker Krey: ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Johanna J. J. Zilliacus: ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Keywan Riahi: ENE Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Nature Communications, 2017, vol. 8, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract The UN Paris Agreement puts in place a legally binding mechanism to increase mitigation action over time. Countries put forward pledges called nationally determined contributions (NDC) whose impact is assessed in global stocktaking exercises. Subsequently, actions can then be strengthened in light of the Paris climate objective: limiting global mean temperature increase to well below 2 °C and pursuing efforts to limit it further to 1.5 °C. However, pledged actions are currently described ambiguously and this complicates the global stocktaking exercise. Here, we systematically explore possible interpretations of NDC assumptions, and show that this results in estimated emissions for 2030 ranging from 47 to 63 GtCO2e yr−1. We show that this uncertainty has critical implications for the feasibility and cost to limit warming well below 2 °C and further to 1.5 °C. Countries are currently working towards clarifying the modalities of future NDCs. We identify salient avenues to reduce the overall uncertainty by about 10 percentage points through simple, technical clarifications regarding energy accounting rules. Remaining uncertainties depend to a large extent on politically valid choices about how NDCs are expressed, and therefore raise the importance of a thorough and robust process that keeps track of where emissions are heading over time.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15748 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms15748

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15748

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().