EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Learning relative values in the striatum induces violations of normative decision making

Tilmann A. Klein (), Markus Ullsperger and Gerhard Jocham ()
Additional contact information
Tilmann A. Klein: Cognitive Neuroscience, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Markus Ullsperger: Cognitive Neuroscience, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Gerhard Jocham: Cognitive Neuroscience, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Nature Communications, 2017, vol. 8, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract To decide optimally between available options, organisms need to learn the values associated with these options. Reinforcement learning models offer a powerful explanation of how these values are learnt from experience. However, human choices often violate normative principles. We suggest that seemingly counterintuitive decisions may arise as a natural consequence of the learning mechanisms deployed by humans. Here, using fMRI and a novel behavioural task, we show that, when suddenly switched to novel choice contexts, participants’ choices are incongruent with values learnt by standard learning algorithms. Instead, behaviour is compatible with the decisions of an agent learning how good an option is relative to an option with which it had previously been paired. Striatal activity exhibits the characteristics of a prediction error used to update such relative option values. Our data suggest that choices can be biased by a tendency to learn option values with reference to the available alternatives.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms16033 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms16033

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16033

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms16033