Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke

A. Biasiucci, R. Leeb, I. Iturrate, S. Perdikis, A. Al-Khodairy, T. Corbet, A. Schnider, T. Schmidlin, H. Zhang, M. Bassolino, D. Viceic, P. Vuadens, A. G. Guggisberg and J. d. R. Millán ()
Additional contact information
A. Biasiucci: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
R. Leeb: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
I. Iturrate: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
S. Perdikis: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
A. Al-Khodairy: SUVACare - Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
T. Corbet: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
A. Schnider: University Hospital of Geneva
T. Schmidlin: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
H. Zhang: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
M. Bassolino: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
D. Viceic: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
P. Vuadens: SUVACare - Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
A. G. Guggisberg: University Hospital of Geneva
J. d. R. Millán: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Nature Communications, 2018, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Abstract Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are used in stroke rehabilitation to translate brain signals into intended movements of the paralyzed limb. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of BCI-based therapies remain unclear. Here we show that BCI coupled to functional electrical stimulation (FES) elicits significant, clinically relevant, and lasting motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors more effectively than sham FES. Such recovery is associated to quantitative signatures of functional neuroplasticity. BCI patients exhibit a significant functional recovery after the intervention, which remains 6–12 months after the end of therapy. Electroencephalography analysis pinpoints significant differences in favor of the BCI group, mainly consisting in an increase in functional connectivity between motor areas in the affected hemisphere. This increase is significantly correlated with functional improvement. Results illustrate how a BCI–FES therapy can drive significant functional recovery and purposeful plasticity thanks to contingent activation of body natural efferent and afferent pathways.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04673-z Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-04673-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().