Publisher Correction: Imaging the square of the correlated two-electron wave function of a hydrogen molecule

M. Waitz, R. Y. Bello, D. Metz, J. Lower, F. Trinter, C. Schober, M. Keiling, U. Lenz, M. Pitzer, K. Mertens, M. Martins, J. Viefhaus, S. Klumpp, T. Weber, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, J. B. Williams, M. S. Schöffler, V. V. Serov, A. S. Kheifets, L. Argenti, A. Palacios, F. Martín (), T. Jahnke and R. Dörner ()
Additional contact information
M. Waitz: J. W. Goethe Universität
R. Y. Bello: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
D. Metz: J. W. Goethe Universität
J. Lower: J. W. Goethe Universität
F. Trinter: J. W. Goethe Universität
C. Schober: J. W. Goethe Universität
M. Keiling: J. W. Goethe Universität
U. Lenz: J. W. Goethe Universität
M. Pitzer: Universität Kassel
K. Mertens: Universität Hamburg
M. Martins: Universität Hamburg
J. Viefhaus: Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY
S. Klumpp: Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY
T. Weber: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
L. Ph. H. Schmidt: J. W. Goethe Universität
J. B. Williams: University of Nevada Reno
M. S. Schöffler: J. W. Goethe Universität
V. V. Serov: Saratov State University
A. S. Kheifets: The Australian National University
L. Argenti: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
A. Palacios: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
F. Martín: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
T. Jahnke: J. W. Goethe Universität
R. Dörner: J. W. Goethe Universität

Nature Communications, 2018, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-1

Abstract: The original version of this Article contained an error in the fifth sentence of the first paragraph of the ‘Application on H2’ section of the Results, which incorrectly read ‘The role of electron correlation is quite apparent in this presentation: Fig. 1a is empty for the uncorrelated Hartree–Fock wave function, since projection of the latter wave function onto the 2pσu orbital is exactly zero, while this is not the case for the fully correlated wave function (Fig. 1d); also, Fig. 1b, c for the uncorrelated description are identical, while Fig. 1e, f for the correlated case are significantly different.’ The correct version replaces ‘Fig. 1e, f’ with ‘Fig. 2e and f’.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04740-5 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-04740-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04740-5

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie

More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().