Assessing the feasibility of carbon dioxide mitigation options in terms of energy usage
Oytun Babacan (),
Sven Causmaecker,
Ajay Gambhir,
Mathilde Fajardy,
A. William Rutherford,
Andrea Fantuzzi and
Jenny Nelson ()
Additional contact information
Oytun Babacan: Imperial College London
Sven Causmaecker: Imperial College London
Ajay Gambhir: Imperial College London
Mathilde Fajardy: Imperial College London
A. William Rutherford: Imperial College London
Andrea Fantuzzi: Imperial College London
Jenny Nelson: Imperial College London
Nature Energy, 2020, vol. 5, issue 9, 720-728
Abstract:
Abstract Measures to mitigate the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) can vary substantially in terms of the energy required. Some proposed CO2 mitigation options involve energy-intensive processes that compromise their viability as routes to mitigation, especially if deployed at a global scale. Here we provide an assessment of different mitigation options in terms of their energy usage. We assess the relative effectiveness of several CO2 mitigation routes by calculating the energy cost of carbon abatement (kilowatt-hour spent per kilogram CO2-equivalent, or kWh kgCO2e–1) mitigated. We consider energy efficiency measures, decarbonizing electricity, heat, chemicals and fuels, and also capturing CO2 from air. Among the routes considered, switching to renewable energy technologies (0.05–0.53 kWh kgCO2e–1 mitigated) offer more energy-effective mitigation than carbon embedding or carbon removal approaches, which are more energy intensive (0.99–10.03 kWh kgCO2e–1 and 0.78–2.93 kWh kgCO2e–1 mitigated, respectively), whereas energy efficiency measures, such as improving building lighting, can offer the most energy-effective mitigation.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-020-0646-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natene:v:5:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1038_s41560-020-0646-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nenergy/
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0646-1
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Energy is currently edited by Fouad Khan
More articles in Nature Energy from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().