EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour

Gareth J. Hollands (), Giacomo Bignardi, Marie Johnston, Michael P. Kelly, David Ogilvie, Mark Petticrew, Andrew Prestwich, Ian Shemilt, Stephen Sutton and Theresa M. Marteau
Additional contact information
Gareth J. Hollands: Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health
Giacomo Bignardi: Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health
Marie Johnston: Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen
Michael P. Kelly: University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health
David Ogilvie: MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science
Mark Petticrew: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Andrew Prestwich: School of Psychology, University of Leeds
Ian Shemilt: EPPI-Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London
Stephen Sutton: University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health
Theresa M. Marteau: Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health

Nature Human Behaviour, 2017, vol. 1, issue 8, 1-9

Abstract: Abstract Reflecting widespread interest in concepts of ‘nudging’ and ‘choice architecture’, there is increasing research and policy attention on altering aspects of the small-scale physical environment, such as portion sizes or the placement of products, to change health-related behaviour at the population level. There is, however, a lack of clarity in characterizing these interventions and no reliable framework incorporating standardized definitions. This hampers both the synthesis of cumulative evidence about intervention effects, and the identification of intervention opportunities. To address this, a new tool, TIPPME (typology of interventions in proximal physical micro-environments), has been developed and here applied to the selection, purchase and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. This provides a framework to reliably classify and describe, and enable more systematic design, reporting and analysis of, an important class of interventions. In doing so, it makes a distinct contribution to collective efforts to build the cumulative evidence base for effective ways of changing behaviour across populations.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0140 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0140

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/

DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0140

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Human Behaviour is currently edited by Stavroula Kousta

More articles in Nature Human Behaviour from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0140