Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds

Joaquin Navajas (), Tamara Niella, Gerry Garbulsky, Bahador Bahrami and Mariano Sigman
Additional contact information
Tamara Niella: Universidad Torcuato Di Tella
Gerry Garbulsky: TED
Bahador Bahrami: University College London

Nature Human Behaviour, 2018, vol. 2, issue 2, 126-132

Abstract: Abstract The aggregation of many independent estimates can outperform the most accurate individual judgement 1–3 . This centenarian finding 1,2 , popularly known as the 'wisdom of crowds' 3 , has been applied to problems ranging from the diagnosis of cancer 4 to financial forecasting 5 . It is widely believed that social influence undermines collective wisdom by reducing the diversity of opinions within the crowd. Here, we show that if a large crowd is structured in small independent groups, deliberation and social influence within groups improve the crowd’s collective accuracy. We asked a live crowd (N = 5,180) to respond to general-knowledge questions (for example, "What is the height of the Eiffel Tower?"). Participants first answered individually, then deliberated and made consensus decisions in groups of five, and finally provided revised individual estimates. We found that averaging consensus decisions was substantially more accurate than aggregating the initial independent opinions. Remarkably, combining as few as four consensus choices outperformed the wisdom of thousands of individuals.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0273-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0273-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/

DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0273-4

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Human Behaviour is currently edited by Stavroula Kousta

More articles in Nature Human Behaviour from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().