No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the ABCD study

Anthony Steven Dick (), Nelcida L. Garcia, Shannon M. Pruden, Wesley K. Thompson, Samuel W. Hawes, Matthew T. Sutherland, Michael C. Riedel, Angela R. Laird and Raul Gonzalez
Additional contact information
Anthony Steven Dick: Florida International University
Nelcida L. Garcia: Florida International University
Shannon M. Pruden: Florida International University
Wesley K. Thompson: University of California, San Diego
Samuel W. Hawes: Florida International University
Matthew T. Sutherland: Florida International University
Michael C. Riedel: Florida International University
Angela R. Laird: Florida International University
Raul Gonzalez: Florida International University

Nature Human Behaviour, 2019, vol. 3, issue 7, 692-701

Abstract: Abstract Learning a second language in childhood is inherently advantageous for communication. However, parents, educators and scientists have been interested in determining whether there are additional cognitive advantages. One of the most exciting yet controversial1 findings about bilinguals is a reported advantage for executive function. That is, several studies suggest that bilinguals perform better than monolinguals on tasks assessing cognitive abilities that are central to the voluntary control of thoughts and behaviours—the so-called ‘executive functions’ (for example, attention, inhibitory control, task switching and resolving conflict). Although a number of small-2–4 and large-sample5,6 studies have reported a bilingual executive function advantage (see refs. 7–9 for a review), there have been several failures to replicate these findings10–15, and recent meta-analyses have called into question the reliability of the original empirical claims8,9. Here we show, in a very large sample (n = 4,524) of 9- to 10-year-olds across the United States, that there is little evidence for a bilingual advantage for inhibitory control, attention and task switching, or cognitive flexibility, which are key aspects of executive function. We also replicate previously reported disadvantages in English vocabulary in bilinguals7,16,17. However, these English vocabulary differences are substantially mitigated when we account for individual differences in socioeconomic status or intelligence. In summary, notwithstanding the inherently positive benefits of learning a second language in childhood18, we found little evidence that it engenders additional benefits to executive function development.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0609-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nathum:v:3:y:2019:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-019-0609-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/

DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0609-3

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Human Behaviour is currently edited by Stavroula Kousta

More articles in Nature Human Behaviour from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().