EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic

Anton Gollwitzer (), Cameron Martel, William J. Brady, Philip Pärnamets, Isaac G. Freedman, Eric D. Knowles and Jay J. Van Bavel ()
Additional contact information
Anton Gollwitzer: Yale University
Cameron Martel: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
William J. Brady: Yale University
Philip Pärnamets: New York University
Isaac G. Freedman: Yale University
Eric D. Knowles: New York University
Jay J. Van Bavel: New York University

Nature Human Behaviour, 2020, vol. 4, issue 11, 1186-1197

Abstract: Abstract Numerous polls suggest that COVID-19 is a profoundly partisan issue in the United States. Using the geotracking data of 15 million smartphones per day, we found that US counties that voted for Donald Trump (Republican) over Hillary Clinton (Democrat) in the 2016 presidential election exhibited 14% less physical distancing between March and May 2020. Partisanship was more strongly associated with physical distancing than numerous other factors, including counties’ COVID-19 cases, population density, median income, and racial and age demographics. Contrary to our predictions, the observed partisan gap strengthened over time and remained when stay-at-home orders were active. Additionally, county-level consumption of conservative media (Fox News) was related to reduced physical distancing. Finally, the observed partisan differences in distancing were associated with subsequently higher COVID-19 infection and fatality growth rates in pro-Trump counties. Taken together, these data suggest that US citizens’ responses to COVID-19 are subject to a deep—and consequential—partisan divide.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (82)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-00977-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nathum:v:4:y:2020:i:11:d:10.1038_s41562-020-00977-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/

DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Human Behaviour is currently edited by Stavroula Kousta

More articles in Nature Human Behaviour from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-05
Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:4:y:2020:i:11:d:10.1038_s41562-020-00977-7