Resilience reconciled

Craig R. Allen, David G. Angeler, Brian C. Chaffin, Dirac Twidwell and Ahjond Garmestani ()
Additional contact information
Craig R. Allen: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
David G. Angeler: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Brian C. Chaffin: University of Montana
Dirac Twidwell: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Ahjond Garmestani: Office of Research and Development

Nature Sustainability, 2019, vol. 2, issue 10, 898-900

Abstract: Resilience scholarship continues to inspire opaque discourse and competing frameworks often inconsistent with the complexity inherent in social–ecological systems. We contend that competing conceptualizations of resilience are reconcilable, and that the core theory is useful for navigating sustainability challenges.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0401-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0401-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/natsustain/

DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0401-4

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Sustainability is currently edited by Monica Contestabile

More articles in Nature Sustainability from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().