A scoping review of interventions for crop postharvest loss reduction in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia

Tanya Stathers (), Deirdre Holcroft, Lisa Kitinoja, Brighton M. Mvumi, Alicia English, Oluwatoba Omotilewa, Megan Kocher, Jessica Ault and Maximo Torero
Additional contact information
Tanya Stathers: University of Greenwich
Deirdre Holcroft: Holcroft Postharvest Consulting
Lisa Kitinoja: The Postharvest Education Foundation
Brighton M. Mvumi: University of Zimbabwe
Alicia English: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
Oluwatoba Omotilewa: African Development Bank
Megan Kocher: University of Minnesota
Jessica Ault: National Agricultural Library

Nature Sustainability, 2020, vol. 3, issue 10, 821-835

Abstract: Abstract Reducing postharvest losses (PHLs) of food crops is a critical component of sustainably increasing agricultural productivity. Many PHL reduction interventions have been tested, but synthesized information to support evidence-based investments and policy is scarce. In this study, PHL reduction interventions for 22 crops across 57 countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia from the 1970s to 2019 were systematically reviewed. Screening of the 12,907 studies identified resulted in a collection of 334 studies, which were used to synthesize the evidence and construct an online open-access database, searchable by crop, country, postharvest activity and intervention type. Storage technology interventions mainly targeting farmers dominated (83% of the studies). Maize was the most studied crop (25%). India had the most studies (32%), while 25 countries had no studies. This analysis indicates an urgent need for a systematic assessment of interventions across the entire value chain over multiple seasons and sites, targeting stakeholders beyond farmers. The lack of studies on training, finance, infrastructure, policy and market interventions highlights the need for interventions beyond technologies or handling practice changes. Additionally, more studies are needed connecting the impact of PHL reductions to social, economic and environmental outcomes related to Sustainable Development Goals. This analysis provides decision makers with data for informed policy formulation and prioritization of investments in PHL reduction.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-00622-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-020-00622-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/natsustain/

DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00622-1

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Sustainability is currently edited by Monica Contestabile

More articles in Nature Sustainability from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().