Rethinking Social Safety Nets in a Changing Society: Evidence from the India Human Development Survey

Sonalde Desai, Debasis Barik, Pallavi Choudhuri, Bijay Chouhan, Om Prakash Sharma, Sharan Sharma and Dinesh Kumar Tiwari
Additional contact information
Sonalde Desai: National Council of Applied Economic Research
Debasis Barik: National Council of Applied Economic Research
Pallavi Choudhuri: National Council of Applied Economic Research
Bijay Chouhan: National Council of Applied Economic Research
Om Prakash Sharma: National Council of Applied Economic Research
Sharan Sharma: National Council of Applied Economic Research
Dinesh Kumar Tiwari: National Council of Applied Economic Research

India Policy Forum, 2025, vol. 21, issue 1, 96-136

Abstract: With a growing economy and declining poverty, India faces a curious challenge in providing a social safety net to its citizens. Using data from three rounds of the India Human Development Survey (IHDS), collected in 2004-05, 2011-12, and 2022-24, this paper shows that households face considerable transition in and out of poverty as the economy grows. Historically, India's approach to social safety nets has involved identifying the poor and providing them with priority access to various social protection programs that include both in-kind and cash assistance however, the nature of poverty changes with economic growth. This churn in households' economic circumstances makes it difficult to identify and target the poor precisely. Using unique, newly collected, panel data, this paper makes three observations about India's anti-poverty programs: (1) Identification of households as poor (now dubbed priority households) relies on identification exercises carried out every 10-15 years and assumes that poverty status is relatively static. However, results presented in this paper document a substantial transition in and out of poverty. (2) This ex-ante identification of needy households leads to relatively weak correlation between households' actual economic status and access to social safety nets. This should not be assumed to be an example of elite capture but rather an artefact of a static program design. (3) Recognition of exclusion and inclusion errors led to an advocacy for a vast expansion of the population eligible for benefits. It was assumed that this expansion will reduce exclusion of the poorest, even if it leads to greater inclusion of the non-poor. However, experience of the National Food Security Act 2013, documented in this paper, shows that even as the proportion of households owning a Below the Poverty Line (BPL) card grew from 41 percent to 60 percent between 2011-12 and 2022-23, 30 percent of the poor were left out. This suggests that addressing inclusion and exclusion errors may be difficult, particularly in an era of economic growth. Social safety nets may need to be redesigned in a way that is responsive to changing economic conditions and unexpected events, both at the individual and the community levels.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ncaer.org/publication/india-policy-forum-2024/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nca:ncaerj:v:21:y:2025:i:2025-1:p:96-136

Access Statistics for this article

India Policy Forum is currently edited by B Ramesh

More articles in India Policy Forum from National Council of Applied Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by B Ramesh ().