Method of monitoring of the implementation of anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and their projects into the lawmaking activity

Vladimir Yuzhakov, Alexey Efremov and Alexey Tsirin

Public administration issues, 2015, issue 1, 92-103

Abstract: The article presents main results of the development and approbation of the technology (methods) to monitor the incorporation of the anticorruption expertise of the normative legal acts and projects (AE NLAP) in the lawmaking activity of public authorities and local government in the Russian Federation. The expertise was carried out within the scientific research work of the same name by researchers in the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.According to the authors of the article, the Composite Technique (Methods) to carry out monitoring of the implementation of the AE NLAP in the practice of lawmaking activity and the productivity of anticorruption expertise must: include the study of the indicators of the execution of all instructions of the adopted normative legal acts concerning the anticorruption examination (on decision-making, performing actions, observing the requirements, bans and restrictions) on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the productivity of anticorruption expertise, including the solution of problems that have caused the necessity of anticorruption expertise, achievement of the set objectives; orientate the anticorruption expertise productivity indicators system towards assessing the extent of influence of the AE NLAP on corruption risks of the legal regulations, on corruption practices and markets; provide the possibility to assess the extent of realization of the anticorruption expertise by using these indicators, to do the correlating with them about the bodies and organizations responsible for carrying out anticorruption expertise, with the years of research being taken into consideration. The authors carried out approbation of this technology in relation to: the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation; Prosecutor Generals Office of the Russian Federation; Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Public Administration of Murmansk region.The carried-out approbation showed the possibility of practical use of the developed Technique, including tools, and also its introduction in the public administration of counteracting corruption in public authorities and local government.

Keywords: anti-corruption examination (expertise); corruption; monitoring; regulations; lawmaking activity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2015/03/26/1096180576/%D0% ... 8%D0%BD%201-2015.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2015:i:1:p:92-103

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public administration issues from Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Irina A. Zvereva ().