Popular Philology and Secondary SchoolA Review of the Book: Troitsky V. (2010) Sudby russkoy shkoly. Problemy naslediya russkoy slovesnosti [The Fate and Fortune of Russian School. Legacy Issues in Russian Philology]. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilization

Alexey Lyubzhin

Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, issue 2, 283-294

Abstract: Alexey Lyubzhin - Doctor of Sciences in Philology, Research Fellow at the Department of Rare Books and Manuscripts of the Science Library, Moscow State University. Address: 9 Mokhovaya Str., 103073 Moscow, Russian Federation. E-mail: vulture@mail.ruIt appears relevant to provide a critical review of the presented book as a manifesto of conservative views, so popular today, and as an indicator of the disorientation of modern society, which has a poor knowledge of the Russian school and thus sees its traditions in things that pronouncedly contradict them. The review provides an analysis of Vsevolod Troitsky's perspective on teaching literature in school, the list of authors he finds advisable to include in school syllabi, his conception of historicism in teaching literature, and his ideas of the old Russian and Soviet schools.

Keywords: teaching literature in school; old Russian school; Soviet school; syllabus; equality in education; educational policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nos:voprob:2018:i:2:p:283-294

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marta Morozova ().