Art History and Archeology in the Educational Space of Revolutionary Russia: Two Unknown Projects of 1917
Vitaliy Ananiev and
Mikhail Bukharin
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2018, issue 3, 268-286
Abstract:
Vitaliy Ananiev - Senior Lecturer, Institute of Philosophy, Saint-Petersburg State University. E-mail: v.ananev@spbu.ru.Mikhail Bukharin - D.Litt., Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Researcher, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. E-mail: michabucha@gmail.comA discussion on the reform of higher education in humanities in Russia in the spring of 1917 is analyzed. At the center of this discussion, questions regarding the organization of the teaching of general history of arts and archeology at Petrograd University and in technical colleges are considered. This discussion reflected the long process of delimitation of a number of disciplines (classical philology, history of art, archeology) and the formation of their own research and teaching field. Two earlier unknown documents are published: a letter from S. A. Zhebelev to V. N. Rakint, the Scientific Secretary of the Institute of History of Arts, and a note by V. Ya. Kurbatov About teaching of the history of art in the higher technical educational institutions from the funds of the Central State Archive of Literature and Arts. These documents expand our ideas of the history of the reforming of the higher school in 1917-1922, and the final delimitation of history of arts and archeology not only as academic disciplines, but also as educational directions. Zhebelev's letter and Kurbatov's note characterize the atmosphere in the Russian pedagogical environment of 1917-1922, when large-scale and effective reforms of the higher school were possible. It is obvious that some of the ideas stated during the given discussion and realized during the formation of the faculty of social sciences of Petrograd University are relevant today as well: curricula, training of teaching staff, emphasis on practical use of theoretical knowledge, and a polydisciplinary approach in the educational process.
Keywords: teaching; higher school; archeology; history of arts; curriculum; educational discussion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nos:voprob:2018:i:3:p:268-286
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marta Morozova ().