Directly Valuing Animal Welfare in (Environmental) Economics

Alexis Carlier and Nicolas Treich

International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, vol. 14, issue 1, 113-152

Abstract: Research in economics is anthropocentric. It only cares about the welfare of humans and usually does not concern itself with animals. When it does, animals are treated as resources, biodiversity, or food. That is, animals only have instrumental value for humans. Yet, unlike water, trees, or vegetables, and like humans, most animals have a brain and a nervous system. They can feel pain and pleasure and many argue that their welfare should matter. Some economic studies value animal welfare, but only indirectly through humans' altruistic valuation. This overall position of economics is inconsistent with the utilitarian tradition and can be qualified as speciesist. We suggest that economics should directly value the welfare of sentient animals, at least sometimes. We briefly discuss some possible implications and challenges for (environmental) economics.

Keywords: Animal welfare; environmental economics; agricultural economics; economic valuation; speciesism; ethics; sentience; effective altruism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I30 Q18 Q51 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/101.00000115 (application/xml)

Related works:
Working Paper: Directly Valuing Animal Welfare in (Environmental) Economics (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jirere:101.00000115

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().