{'italic': 'Shelby', '#text': "Throwing Away the Umbrella: Minority Voting after the Supreme Court's Decision"}

Mayya Komisarchik and Ariel White

Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2025, vol. 20, issue 2, 269-305

Abstract: Shelby County v. HolderShelbyShelbyThe Supreme Court's 2013 decision in dramatically changed the Voting Rights Act, ending the "preclearance" process that had required federal approval before places with a history of discrimination changed their voting procedures. Dissenting justices and voting-rights advocates feared the decision could allow changes to election administration that would suppress minority voter participation. This paper evaluates the decision's impact on election practices and on voting. yielded decisive changes in some practices that had been constrained by preclearance (voter identification laws), though evidence on potential indirect changes to election administration is mixed. These bounded changes to election practices do not appear to have translated into a degradation of minority voter participation or power over the period studied. Using administrative data and a difference-in-differences design comparing places affected and unaffected by the court's decision, we find minimal changes in Black-white voting gaps in the post- period; further analyses indicate that voter participation was generally stable or potentially increasing in previously covered places.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00023045 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00023045

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quarterly Journal of Political Science from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().