Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation
Antti Petajisto and
Eric Zitzewitz ()
Critical Finance Review, 2013, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-48
Standard Fama-French and Carhart models produce economically and statistically significant nonzero alphas, even for passive benchmark indices such as the S&P 500 and Russell 2000. We find that these alphas primarily arise from the disproportionate weight that the Fama-French factors place on small value stocks, which have performed well, and from the CRSP value-weighted market index, which is historically a downward-biased benchmark for U.S. stocks due to the inclusion of other types of securities such as closed-end funds. We propose small methodological changes to the Fama-French factors to eliminate the nonzero alphas, and we also propose factor models based on common and tradable benchmark indices. Both kinds of alternative models improve performance evaluation of actively managed portfolios with the index-based models exhibiting the best performance.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000007
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alet Heezemans ().