The Changing Nature of Institutional Stock Investing

Marshall E. Blume and Donald B. Keim

Critical Finance Review, 2017, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-41

Abstract: We document that institutional investors, particularly hedge funds, decreased their holdings of larger stocks from 1980 to 2010 and increased their holdings of smaller stocks. Since 1990 institutions have underweighted, relative to market weights, those stocks that make up the largest 40 percent of the value of the market, and since 2006 have overweighted the stocks that make up the smallest 20 percent of the market. The contrary findings in the literature that institutions overweight larger stocks and underweight smaller stocks (e.g., Gompers and Metrick (2001) and Bennett et al. (2003)) are due to the use of a linear relation between institutional ownership and the logarithm of market value. In fact, we show that this relation is nonlinear and resembles an inverted U. We discuss three factors that may have contributed to these changes in institutional holdings: better understanding of diversification; growing awareness of the small stock premium; and less efficient pricing of smaller stocks relative to larger stocks.

Keywords: Institutional investors; Institutional stock ownership; SEC 13F filings; Hedge funds; Gfficient pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 G11 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000033 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000033

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().