Acquisitions as Lotteries? The Selection of Target-Firm Risk and its Impact on Merger Outcomes

Christoph Schneider and Oliver Spalt

Critical Finance Review, 2017, vol. 6, issue 1, 77-132

Abstract: From 1987 to 2008, riskier firms were more likely to be taken over. Yet, on average, the acquirer declined in value by 2.8% when it bought a “risky target†(the third tercile, having an annualized idiosyncratic volatility of 61% or more), but only by 0.6% when it bought a “safe target†(the first tercile, 38% or less). The effect was even stronger for risky targets with positively skewed expected returns. The value difference is robust to controlling for acquirer and target characteristics, and carries over to the joint value change. Riskier target acquisitions also had lower post-acquisition accounting returns. An acquiring-firm CEO fixed effect in the data suggests CEO preferences play a role, which we can trace to several proxies for gambling propensity.

Keywords: Behavioral Corporate Finance; Mergers and Acquisitions; Gambling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 G34 G39 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000035 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000035

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().