A Review of the Returnâ€”Illiquidity Relationship
Tom Smith and
Anna von Reibnitz
Critical Finance Review, 2019, vol. 8, issue 1-2, 127-171
Amihud (2002) shows that expected market illiquidity has a positive impact on ex ante stock returns, while the reverse relation exists between unexpected illiquidity and contemporaneous returns, suggesting the presence of a priced risk factor. We replicate these findings inâ€“sample, but the outâ€“ofâ€“sample results largely lose their significance and monotonic properties in the timeâ€“series. This points to a decline in the sensitivity of investors to illiquidity risk over the last two decades, a period during which technological innovations and decimalization have markedly reduced transaction costs and increased stock liquidity. Altering the measurement frequency, refining the data filters and considering alternative test specifications leads to similar results. A crossâ€“validation approach confirms a change point in liquidity occurring post publication of the seminal study. We also show that the findings pertaining to the employed illiquidity measure are driven by scaling the numerator of the ratio by the dollarâ€“traded volume.
Keywords: Liquidity and asset pricing; Illiquidity risk premium; Flight to liquidity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000052
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alet Heezemans ().