Liquidity Risk After 20 Years

Pástor, Luboš and Robert Stambaugh
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Lubos Pastor

Critical Finance Review, 2019, vol. 8, issue 1-2, 277-299

Abstract: The Critical Finance Review commissioned Li et al. (2019) and Pontiff and Singla (2019) to replicate the results in Pástor and Stambaugh (2003). Both studies successfully replicate our market-wide liquidity measure and find similar estimates of the liquidity risk premium. In the sample period after our study, the liquidity risk premium estimates are even larger, and the liquidity measure displays sharp drops during the 2008 financial crisis. We respond to both replication studies and offer some related thoughts, such as when to use our traded versus non-traded liquidity factors and how to improve the precision of liquidity beta estimates.

Keywords: Liquidity; Liquidity risk; Liquidity factor; Liquidity beta; Replication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000074 (application/xml)

Related works:
Working Paper: Liquidity Risk After 20 Years (2019)
Working Paper: Liquidity Risk After 20 Years (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000074

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().