Andrea L. Eisfeldt,
Edward T. Kim and
Critical Finance Review, 2022, vol. 11, issue 2, 299-332
Intangible assets are absent from traditional measures of firm value despite their growing importance in firmsâ€™ capital stocks. We propose a simple improvement to the classic Fama and French (1992, 1993) value factor that incorporates intangibles and addresses differences in accounting practices across industries. Our intangible value factor prices assets as well as or better than the traditional value factor but yields substantially higher returns. This outperformance holds over the entire sample period, including in more recent decades during which value has underperformed. We show that the intangible value factor sorts more effectively within industries on productivity, profitability, financial soundness, and on other valuation ratios such as price-to-earnings.
Keywords: 299-332 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E22 G1 G10 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000113
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alet Heezemans ().