The Jobs Act Did Not Raise IPO Underpricing
N. Patatoukas Panos and
S. Yoon Young
Critical Finance Review, 2022, vol. 11, issue 3-4, 431-471
While the intended goal of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act was to ease access to capital for emerging growth companies (EGCs), prior studies, notably Barth et al. (2017), find evidence of an increase in initial public offering (IPO) underpricing and a higher cost of equity capital for EGC issuers. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that changes in overall IPO market conditions explain the seeming increase in IPO underpricing. In fact, EGC issuers that take advantage of the accounting disclosure relief afforded by the Act raise capital at higher pre-IPO multiples. These reduced-accounting disclosure EGCs have more speculative valuation profiles and lower institutional ownership and are more likely to destroy long-term shareholder value in the IPO aftermarket. Overall, our paper offers an alternative perspective on the effect of the JOBS Act on IPO pricing.
Keywords: JOBS Act; Emerging growth companies; IPO pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G20 G24 G38 K22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000117
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alet Heezemans ().