Diseconomies of Scale in Active Management: Robust Evidence

Luboš Pástor, Robert Stambaugh, Lucian A. Taylor and Min Zhu
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Lubos Pastor

Critical Finance Review, 2022, vol. 11, issue 3-4, 593-611

Abstract: We take a deeper look at the robustness of evidence presented by Pástor et al. (2015) and Zhu (2018), who find that an actively managed mutual fund’s returns relate negatively to both fund size and the size of the active mutual fund industry. When we apply robust regression methods, we confirm both studies’ inferences about scale diseconomies at the fund and industry levels. Moreover, data errors play no role, as both studies’ results are insensitive to applying various error screens and using alternative return benchmarks. We reject constant returns to scale even after dropping 25% of the most extreme return observations. Finally, we caution that asymmetric removal of influential observations delivers biased conclusions about diseconomies of scale.

Keywords: Returns to scale; Active management; Mutual funds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G23 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000121 (application/xml)

Related works:
Working Paper: Diseconomies of Scale in Active Management: Robust Evidence (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000121

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().