So What Do We Learn from Li and Wang (2025)?

Michael Ungeheuer and Martin Weber

Critical Finance Review, 2025, vol. 14, issue 1, 123-128

Abstract: ex-anteWe criticize ad-hoc tests of return predictability, like those presented by Li and Wang (2025), which are purely motivated by statistical associations. Without hypotheses grounded in theory or evidence on portfolio choice, it is difficult to say what we learn from such correlation exercises. We then discuss how convincing progress can be made in uncovering the foundations of portfolio choice and asset pricing, drawing on our own experimental research for illustration.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000153 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000153

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().