Randomized Controlled History?

Ajay Verghese

Journal of Historical Political Economy, 2024, vol. 4, issue 3, 361-389

Abstract: A newer strand of research in historical political economy applies a "design-based inference" approach to history in order to approximate a randomized controlled trial. But can this exacting approach work given the messy nature of historical data? Using the example of research on the long-term effects of British colonialism in India, I evaluate six recent articles that use techniques like natural experiments of history, instrumental variable analyses, and matching designs to overcome the fact that colonization was not random. I find that despite generating important methodological conversations about causation, the use of these techniques in these studies depends on thin or sometimes inaccurate historical evidence. It is therefore unclear that "randomized controlled history" can make more credible causal inferences than a selection on observables approach. This article suggests best practices for future research that aims to study history in an experimental format.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000078 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000078

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Historical Political Economy from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().