Against Expertism

Roger Koppl

Review of Behavioral Economics, 2021, vol. 8, issue 3-4, 361-377

Abstract: Escaping Paternalism’s critique of the rationality assumption vindicates von Mises’ distinction between egalitarian contracts and hierarchical commands, revealing “libertarian paternalism†as an oxymoron. Putting Escaping Paternalism in a zoological context lets us see in “contract and coordination†status acquired by freely given prestige and in “command and subordination†status acquired by forcefully extracted dominance. Libertarian paternalism is a form of dominance. Thus, the “zoological perspective in the social sciences†extends Rizzo and Whitman’s critique of rationality and helps clarify “expertism,†that is, the attempt to acquire “dominance†by leveraging “prestige.†Humans have both an apish disposition to create linear dominance hierarchies and a disposition to form reverse dominance hierarchies. It is undecided whether we can strengthen reverse dominance hierarchies enough to prevent the boots of the few forever stamping on the faces of the many. It is undecided whether the liberal vision of egalitarian cooperation can prevail. But it’s worth fighting for.

Keywords: Paternalism; rationality; expert; experts; expertism; status; dominance; prestige; reverse dominance hierarchies; zoological perspective in social science (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A1 B52 B53 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000147 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000147

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Behavioral Economics from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().