Elected Versus Appointed Assessors and the Achievement of Assessment Uniformity

John H. Bowman and John Mikesell

National Tax Journal, 1989, vol. 42, issue 2, 181-89

Abstract: Debates whether property tax reform can be improved if assessors are appointed rather than elected. Uses data from Virginia where both elected and appointed assessors exist, to explore the effect of assessor selection process on assessor performance.

Date: 1989
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788787 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788787 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:42:y:1989:i:2:p:181-89

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().