Taxes and Spending Under Gramm-Rudman-Hollings

Robert D. Reischauer

National Tax Journal, 1990, vol. 43, issue 3, 223-32

Abstract: Discusses the three key elements of Gramm-Rudman-Hollings (GRH) that were expected to affect budgeting. Concludes that while many people regard the GRH law as a failure, it is not clear that any other process could have achieved it's modicum of success.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788842 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788842 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:43:y:1990:i:3:p:223-32

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().