The Optimal Size of Public Spending and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation
Yew-Kwang Ng ()
National Tax Journal, 2000, vol. 53, issue 2, 253-72
Abstract:
Feldstein (1997) reviews contributions in distortionary costs of taxation, estimating that the cost per incremental dollar of government spending is $2.65. Kaplow (1996) favors the supply of a public good whenever the benefit/cost ratio exceeds one, contrary to the orthodox position that has existed since Pigou (1928). This paper largely reconciles these two opposing positions. The large distortionary costs exist on the revenue side, but are largely offset by the negative distortionary costs on the spending side or by the distributional gain. Kaplow’s and Feldstein’s arguments have to be subject to important qualifications. Additional arguments relevant to "How big should the public spending be?" are also reviewed. Environmental disruption effects, burden-free taxes on diamond goods, and relative-income effects all favor more public spending.
Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.2.05 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.2.05 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
Related works:
Working Paper: The Optimal Size of Public Spending and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation (2000) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:53:y:2000:i:2:p:253-72
Access Statistics for this article
National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry
More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().