EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Remote Vendors and American Sales and Use Taxation: The Balance Between Fixing the Problem and Fixing the Tax

John Mikesell

National Tax Journal, 2000, vol. 53, issue 4, 1273-86

Abstract: The remote vendor problem challenges the sales tax as a revenue producer; even more critical, though, is damage to economic balance, efficiency, and fairness. Congressional relief from the physical presence rule--rendered obsolete by uncertainty about what presence means and by "click and brick" affiliates--requires no undue burden for multi-state enterprises. State adoptions of a burden-reducing common tax structure would be virtually impossible because states have substantially different shares of their tax systems at stake in the sales tax and because they start from unique sales tax structures designed for their own economies and politics. Congress could handle the problem by requiring registration for large remote vendors, but only for states affording vendor-friendly compliance (no local use taxes and reasonable collection compensation).

Date: 2000
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.4S2.01 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.4S2.01 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:53:y:2000:i:4:p:1273-86

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:53:y:2000:i:4:p:1273-86