Whose Child Is It Anyway? Simplifying the Definition of a Child

Janet Holtzblatt and Janet McCubbin

National Tax Journal, 2003, vol. 56, issue 3, 701-18

Abstract: Taxpayers may be eligible for certain tax benefits if they support or live with their children. Each benefit uses a unique definition of child, partly because the provisions address different tax and social policy goals. Other factors, including piecemeal efforts at tax simplification and complicated family structures, contribute to complexity and increase compliance burdens and noncompliance. A consensus is growing that the definition of child can be simplified without sacrificing important policy goals. Proposals to create a uniform definition of child are similar. The differences between the proposals highlight trade-offs that must be made between simplification and other policy objectives.

Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.16 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.16 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:56:y:2003:i:3:p:701-18

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().