Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
Lillian Mills and
George A. Plesko
National Tax Journal, 2003, vol. 56, issue 4, 865-93
In this paper, we review the history and purpose of the corporation income tax return’s Schedule M–1 in light of recent attention to corporate reporting issues. Although the traditional role for the schedule has been to assist the audit process, the reconciliation of book to tax accounting numbers also provides information useful to tax analysts. We find the existing tax return Schedule M–1, largely unchanged since its introduction in 1963, provides insufficient detail for complex reconciliation issues. We propose revisions to the M–1 to achieve better reconciliation, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of public disclosure of such data.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/56/4/ntj-v56n04p865-93- ... ing-gap-proposal.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/56/4/ntj-v56n04p865-93- ... ng-gap-proposal.html (text/html)
Access to most recent volumes (current and past two years) is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
Working Paper: Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:56:y:2003:i:4:p:865-93
Access Statistics for this article
National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry
More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sally Sztrecska ().