The Evolving Schedule M–3: A New Era of Corporate Show and Tell?

Charles Boynton and Lillian Mills

National Tax Journal, 2004, vol. 57, issue 3, 757-72

Abstract: This paper supplements the arguments for replacing Schedule M–1 and outlines the main features of the proposed Schedule M–3. We examine the magnitude of reported book–tax differences and provide evidence of consolidation issues affecting Schedules M–1, L, and Form 1120. Features of the new Schedule M–3 are designed to standardize reporting across firms and distinguish permanent from temporary book–tax differences. Overall, comments received by IRS and Treasury from private industry generally support the proposed changes, with some concerns regarding scope, the size threshold, the need to determine book income on a transaction basis, and effective date.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.14 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.3.14 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:57:y:2004:i:3:p:757-72

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().