Taxing the Stork
Wataru Kureishi and
National Tax Journal, 2008, vol. 61, issue 2, 167-87
We examine the tax–deduction incentive for parents to have babies in December rather than January, focusing on whether or not parents get "shotgun married." We choose this focus because non–shotgun–married parents are more likely than shotgun–married parents to time conception and, consequently, the birth of their children. Results show that in the 1976 forward sample, the tax deduction is positively correlated with December births among non–shotgun–married parents, who are likely to time conception for tax purposes, but not among shotgun–married parents. In other samples, the differential effect between shotgun– and non–shotgun–married parents, is consistent as predicted.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to most recent volumes (current and past two years) is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:61:y:2008:i:2:p:167-87
Access Statistics for this article
National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry
More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sally Sztrecska ().