EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can Administrative Data on Child Support Be Used to Improve the EITC? Evidence From Wisconsin

V. Joseph Hotz and John Scholz

National Tax Journal, 2008, vol. 61, issue 2, 189-203

Abstract: We examine EITC compliance using a unique dataset combining income tax returns, Unemployment Insurance data, state child support data, and data collected by hand from Wisconsin courthouses. A substantial number of EITC claims are made by adults listed as the court–ordered payor or by adults not identified in child support data. Simple calculations extrapolating Wisconsin’s experience to the rest of the country suggest that as much as $1.7 billion of noncompliant EITC claims could possibly be identified. We conclude that the child support case registry can be an effective tool for identifying a subset of inappropriate EITC claims prior to payment.

Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.2.02 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.2.02 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:61:y:2008:i:2:p:189-203

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:61:y:2008:i:2:p:189-203