The Incidence of U.S. Climate Policy: Alternative Uses of Revenues From a Cap-and-Trade Auction

Dallas Burtraw, Richard Sweeney and Margaret Walls

National Tax Journal, 2009, vol. 62, issue 3, 497-518

Abstract: This paper evaluates the costs to households of a carbon dioxide (CO2) cap-and-trade program. We find important variation in the distribution of costs of the policy across 11 regions of the country and across income deciles. The introduction of a price on CO2 emissions is regressive, but this may be outweighed by the distributional effects of CO2 emissions allowances. We evaluate five alternatives for returning any revenues from auctioning emissions allowances—three are progressive (expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit and two cap-and-dividend approaches), while the others are either neutral (a reduction in payroll taxes) or amplify regressivity (a reduction in the income tax). Regional differences are most substantial for low-income households.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (61)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.3.09 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.3.09 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Incidence of U.S. Climate Policy: Alternative Uses of Revenues from a Cap-and-Trade Auction (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:62:y:2009:i:3:p:497-518

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().