Changing Needs, Sticky Budget: Evidence From the Geographic Distribution of U.S. Federal Grants

Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo () and Cecilia Testa

National Tax Journal, 2013, vol. 66, issue 2, 311-342

Abstract: Most U.S. federal grants are allocated through arguably obsolete formulas, leading fast growing states to contend that they are not receiving their fair share of such grants. We examine this issue by analyzing the allocation of formula and non-formula grants during the period 1978–2008. We find that states with fast growing populations are penalized in the allocation of formula grants, whereas for non-formula grants population dynamics does not play a significant role. The estimated losses are sizable and heavily concentrated among the three fastest growing states — Nevada, Arizona, and Florida. Nevertheless, the majority of the U.S. states benefit from formula allocation, thus providing a plausible explanation for the status quo bias in budgetary formulas.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2013.2.02 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2013.2.02 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:311-342

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().